web analytics

Peer Review Process

Annals of Computer Science and Intelligence Systems follows a rigorous, fair, and transparent peer review process to ensure the quality, originality, and academic integrity of published manuscripts.

Type of Peer Review

The journal follows a Double-Blind Peer Review process, where:

  • Reviewers do not know the identity of the authors
  • Authors do not know the identity of the reviewers

This ensures unbiased and objective evaluation.

Review Process Steps

Initial Screening

  • Manuscripts are first reviewed by the Editorial Office
  • Scope relevance, formatting, and basic quality are checked
  • Plagiarism screening is conducted

Manuscripts not meeting journal standards may be rejected at this stage.

Assignment to Reviewers

  • Suitable manuscripts are assigned to expert reviewers in the relevant field
  • Each manuscript is reviewed by at least two independent reviewers

Peer Review Evaluation

Reviewers evaluate manuscripts based on:

  • Originality and novelty
  • Technical and methodological soundness
  • Clarity of presentation
  • Relevance to the journal scope
  • Ethical compliance

Review Decision

Based on reviewers’ comments, the Editor may decide:

  • Accept
  • Accept with minor revisions
  • Major revisions required
  • Reject

Authors are provided with constructive reviewer feedback.

Revision & Final Decision

  • Authors must revise the manuscript and submit a response to reviewers
  • The revised manuscript may be re-reviewed
  • The final decision is made by the Editor-in-Chief

Review Timeline

  • Initial screening: 3–4 days
  • Peer review process: 4–6 weeks
  • Final decision: After satisfactory revision

Ethical Standards

  • The journal strictly follows publication ethics
  • Plagiarism, data fabrication, or unethical practices will result in rejection
  • Confidentiality of manuscripts and reviewer identities is strictly maintained

Conflict of Interest

Reviewers must disclose any conflict of interest and decline review if necessary to maintain objectivity.

Reviewer Responsibilities

  • Provide unbiased and constructive feedback
  • Maintain confidentiality
  • Complete reviews within the stipulated time