Editorial Policies - Annals of Computer Science and Intelligence Systems

The Annals of Computer Science and Intelligence Systems (ACSIS) adheres to strict editorial policies to ensure the integrity, quality, and transparency of all published research. These policies guide authors, reviewers, and editors throughout the publication process, aligning with international standards and best practices in scholarly publishing.

1. Peer Review Policy

ACSIS follows a double-blind peer-review process, ensuring that both authors and reviewers remain anonymous.
Each submitted manuscript is evaluated for originality, scientific accuracy, relevance, and quality.
Typically, two to three expert reviewers assess each submission.
Reviewers provide constructive feedback to improve the manuscript before final acceptance.

2. Manuscript Acceptance

Manuscripts are accepted based on merit, originality, and alignment with the journal’s scope.
Editorial decisions are independent of any author’s ability to pay APCs.
Authors may be asked to revise manuscripts to meet publication standards.

3. Ethical Standards

ACSIS strictly follows ethical publishing guidelines:

Adheres to COPE (Committee on Publication Ethics) standards.
Requires authors to declare conflicts of interest.
Ensures authorship transparency, requiring all authors to have significantly contributed to the research.
Prohibits plagiarism, duplicate submission, and data fabrication.

4. Open Access Policy

ACSIS is a fully open-access journal. All articles are freely available online to maximize visibility and impact.
Published content is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0), allowing reuse with proper attribution.

5. Article Processing Charges (APC)

Authors are charged a nominal Article Processing Charge (APC) only after acceptance.
APCs support peer review, editorial management, digital preservation, and open-access dissemination.
Waivers and discounts are available for authors from low-income countries or with financial constraints.

6. Editorial Independence

Editorial decisions are made solely on academic merit, free from commercial or external influence.
Editors maintain confidentiality throughout the review process.
The journal’s editorial board oversees all decisions, ensuring fairness and adherence to publication standards.

7. Corrections and Retractions

ACSIS maintains transparency in correcting published content.
Corrections, updates, or retractions are clearly documented and linked to the original article.
Retractions occur only in cases of research misconduct, plagiarism, or unethical behavior.

8. Data and Supplementary Materials

Authors are encouraged to submit supporting datasets, code, or supplementary material for transparency and reproducibility.
ACSIS ensures that supplementary materials are archived and linked with the article.

9. Author Responsibilities

Authors submitting to ACSIS must:

Ensure originality and accuracy of their work.
Disclose funding sources and conflicts of interest.
Comply with ethical standards for research involving human or animal subjects.
Agree to the journal’s open-access policy and APC payment.

10. Reviewer Responsibilities

Reviewers are expected to:

Provide objective, unbiased, and constructive feedback.
Maintain confidentiality regarding manuscript content.
Declare conflicts of interest before accepting a review.
Respond within the assigned review timeline.